|
|
||||||||||
|
-28- FOR BETTER OR WORSE: It was argued by the advocates of the Allison amendment (White, 201) that the "seigniorage” * should belong to the government rather than to private individuals (White, 200). Under this Act the Treasury "purchased" 291,272,018.56 ounces of silver bullion at a "cost" of 308,279,260.71 and coined 378,166,793 silver "dollars." The seigniorage amounted to 69,887,532.29 "dollars" (“Coins and Currency”, 8).
The Bland-Allison Act did not
amount to a return to bimetallism, nor did it amount to a free coinage
act. It was therefore looked upon by some as "a wretched compromise"
(Yeoman, 12). Opponents of the Act predicted that since the bullion
value of the silver "dollars" was not equivalent to their purported
value, they would precipitate a panic (White, 204). Their reason was the
silver "dollar" was still fiat money. Their prediction came true (White,
204). The Resumption of Specie There was a different sentiment
in the Senate. On June 17, 1890, silver advocates in control of that
body passed a free coinage bill. The House refused to concur. A
committee was appointed in which the Sherman bill was reported (White,
202). Senator Nelson Aldrich In 1882, Congress had
established a fund of 100,000,000 "dollars" in gold as a special reserve
for the redemption of "Greenbacks." On June 21st, Senator Nelson Aldrich
proposed a bill as an amendment to the National Banking Act. In the
section relating to gold certificates, he wrote "provided that the
Secretary of the Treasury may, in his discretion, suspend the issue of
such certificates whenever the amount of gold coin and gold bullion in
the Treasury available for the redemption of United States notes falls
below 100,000,000 "dollars" (White, 206). A further amending declared
the Secretary "shall" suspend the issue of gold certificates at such
time. |